Blockchain & Web3 Security Assessment
From Layer-1 protocol review to smart contracts, DeFi, and dApps, we assess the Web3 attack surface as a connected system.
Why Blockchain Assessments Need Depth
Web3 risk is not only in contract code. Chain design, wallets, oracles, protocol economics, and web integrations all affect the real attack surface.
A weakness can cascade from protocol core to contracts, dApps, and end-user wallets.
Oracle, RPC, bridge, and off-chain backend assumptions can redefine the security model.
Tooling alone is not enough for financial logic, governance, upgrade paths, and trust boundaries.
Frameworks and References
Top smart contract security risks and review focus areas
For contracts and DeFi reviewsReference taxonomy for common smart contract weaknesses
For common Solidity weaknessesPractical guidance for Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos SDK, and custom chains
For Layer-1 and chain operatorsWhat Do We Test?
- Consensus and fork choice
- Node clients and P2P
- Validators and keys
- Governance and upgrades
- Access control
- Reentrancy
- Upgradeability
- Token standards
- Liquidity pools
- Oracle and pricing
- Flash-loans
- Economic risk
- Web3 frontend
- Wallet flows
- RPC/API backend
- Contract integration
How We Work
We map the protocol, contracts, dApp, validator, and backend components to define the real blockchain attack surface.
We prioritize protocol, smart contract, oracle, wallet, and integration risks based on your chain and business model.
We combine manual testing with targeted tooling to validate exploitable weaknesses, business logic flaws, and unsafe trust assumptions.
You receive prioritized findings, proof-of-concept guidance, and retest support for remediated issues.
Blockchain & Web3 Services
Choose the service that matches your scope, from chain core to user-facing dApps