API Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing

Using OWASP API Security Top 10, we identify and assess REST API and GraphQL vulnerabilities including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, data exposure, and rate limiting flaws.

OWASP API Top 10OWASP ASVSREST & GraphQLCVSS Scoring
OpenAPI
Specification Review
10 of 10
OWASP API Top 10 Risks
286
OWASP ASVS Controls
4
Reference Methodologies

Complete OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) Coverage

Our tests cover all ten OWASP top API security risks

API1

Broken Object Level Authorization

API2

Broken Authentication

API3

Broken Object Property Level Authorization

API4

Unrestricted Resource Consumption

API5

Broken Function Level Authorization

API6

Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows

API7

Server Side Request Forgery

API8

Security Misconfiguration

API9

Improper Inventory Management

API10

Unsafe Consumption of APIs

Why API Security Matters?

APIs are the heart of modern applications and provide direct access to sensitive data

APIs Are Everywhere

Modern applications rely heavily on APIs. Mobile apps, SPAs, microservices, and IoT devices all communicate through APIs, making them critical attack targets.

Direct Data Access

APIs provide direct access to backend data and business logic. A single vulnerability can expose millions of records or enable unauthorized actions.

BOLA/IDOR Risks

Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) is the #1 API risk. Attackers can access other users' data by manipulating object IDs in API requests.

Hidden Attack Surface

APIs often expose undocumented endpoints, debug features, or legacy versions. These hidden endpoints are frequently targeted by attackers.

API Types Coverage

Specialized testing for REST API and GraphQL

REST API
  • Authentication & Authorization
  • BOLA/IDOR Testing
  • Rate Limiting & Throttling
  • Input Validation
  • Mass Assignment
  • Sensitive Data Exposure
  • HTTP Method Tampering
  • CORS Configuration
GraphQL
  • Introspection Security
  • Query Depth Limiting
  • Query Complexity Analysis
  • Field-level Authorization
  • Batching Attacks
  • Alias-based DoS
  • Query Injection
  • Schema Exposure

What Do We Test?

Comprehensive coverage of all API security aspects based on OWASP API Security Top 10

Authentication
How a caller proves who it is, and what happens when that proof is old, copied or forged.
  • JWT Security
  • OAuth 2.0 Flows
  • API Keys
  • Token Expiration
  • Refresh Token Security
Object-level authorization
First in the OWASP API Top 10. Tested with two accounts at the same level, because one account cannot show whether it reaches another account data.
  • BOLA / IDOR
  • Predictable identifiers
  • Ownership checks
  • Nested resources
Function and property-level authorization
Whether a low-privilege caller can reach an administrative operation, and whether it can write a field it should only read.
  • Admin endpoints
  • HTTP method tampering
  • Mass assignment
  • Read-only field writes
Input validation
Every place a value from the request reaches an interpreter, a parser or a file path.
  • SQL / NoSQL injection
  • Command injection
  • XXE
  • Deserialization
  • Parameter pollution
Resource consumption
What one caller can make the service spend: CPU, memory, third-party cost, and the messages it sends on your behalf.
  • Rate limit bypass
  • Oversized payloads
  • Expensive queries
  • Costly third-party calls
Sensitive business flows
An operation can be entirely correct and still be abusable when it is automated: bulk purchase, bulk booking, bulk registration.
  • Automation abuse
  • Workflow step skipping
  • Race conditions
  • Business limits
Server-side request forgery
Where the API fetches a URL the caller supplied, and what it can reach from inside your network when it does.
  • URL parameters
  • Webhooks
  • Import from link
  • Cloud metadata endpoints
Data exposure
What the response carries beyond what the screen shows, and what errors reveal about the inside.
  • Excessive data in responses
  • Error and stack traces
  • Debug endpoints
  • Sensitive headers
Configuration
The settings around the API rather than its code: who may call it from where, over what, and with which methods.
  • CORS policy
  • TLS configuration
  • HTTP headers
  • Verb tampering
  • Documentation exposure
Inventory and third-party APIs
Old versions still answering, staging hosts reachable from outside, and the APIs your API trusts without checking.
  • Deprecated versions
  • Undocumented endpoints
  • Non-production hosts
  • Unvalidated upstream responses

What should the test start with?

The sooner the team knows what exists, the more of the time goes into testing it.

No specification
Endpoints discovered from outside

Closest to an outside attacker, and the only way to learn what is reachable without being documented. It spends time on discovery that could have gone into testing.

Specification and credentials
OpenAPI or a collection, plus an account per role

The usual choice. Coverage is far wider in the same time, and authorization can be tested properly because there are several callers to compare.

Specification, credentials and source
Everything above, plus the code

For logic that cannot be inferred from the outside, and for confirming whether an authorization check exists at all rather than guessing from responses.

Scope, and what we need from you

The quality of the result depends more on these few things than on anything else.

A specification, or the requests themselves

An OpenAPI or Swagger file, or a Postman collection, or a capture of real traffic. Without one of these the first days go to discovering what exists.

Two accounts at every level

Object-level authorization is the first item in the OWASP API Top 10 and it cannot be tested with one account. Two peers per role, and one account per privilege level.

An environment that can take the load

Testing resource limits means sending traffic that looks abusive. On production that needs agreed hours; on staging it needs data that resembles the real thing.

A gateway that lets us through

Where an API gateway or WAF rate-limits by address, our addresses are allowed through for part of the test, so what is measured is the API and not the gateway.

Somewhere to send a critical finding

A named contact on both sides. An exposed administrative endpoint is reported the day it is found, not in the final report.

How each finding gets its severity

A number with no method behind it does not help anyone decide what to fix first.

CVSS v3.1 is the starting point

Every finding is scored with CVSS v3.1, so there is a common language with your engineers and with the tools you already use.

Then what the endpoint reaches

The same weakness on a lookup endpoint and on one that moves money are not the same finding. The base score is adjusted for the data and the action behind it.

Demonstrated, not assumed

Each finding comes with the request and the response that show it. What cannot be reproduced is not reported as a confirmed finding.

An order to fix things in

The report proposes a sequence: what to fix before the next release, and what can wait for the version after it.

Our Process

Our structured approach to API security assessment

1
API Discovery

We map all API endpoints using documentation, traffic analysis, and fuzzing. We identify hidden endpoints, deprecated versions, and undocumented features.

2
Automated Scanning

Using specialized API security tools, we perform automated testing for common vulnerabilities, rate limiting, and authentication issues.

3
Manual Testing

Expert manual testing for business logic flaws, BOLA/IDOR, authorization bypass, and complex attack chains that automated tools miss.

4
Reporting & Retesting

Detailed report with CVSS scores, API-specific remediation, Postman/Swagger collections, and free retesting after fixes.

Project Deliverables

Comprehensive and actionable reports for technical and management teams

Executive Summary

What was tested, what was found and what it means for the business, in language a non-technical reader can act on.

Technical Report

Each finding with its CVSS v3.1 score, the exact request and response that show it, and the endpoint and method it affects.

API Collection

A Postman collection of the requests that reproduce each finding, so your engineers can confirm a fix without waiting for us.

Free Retesting

After you fix, each finding is retested and either confirmed closed or reopened with what still works, and the report is updated.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of APIs do you test?
What is BOLA and why is it the #1 API risk?
How is GraphQL security testing different from REST API testing?
Do you need API documentation to perform testing?
How long does an API security assessment take?
What tools do you use for API security testing?
Can you test APIs with complex authentication like OAuth 2.0?
What deliverables will we receive after the API assessment?
Do you test internal/microservice APIs?
How much does API penetration testing cost?
Do you need our OpenAPI specification?
Why do you ask for two accounts at the same level?
We have an API gateway with rate limiting. Is that enough?
Can this run against production?
Are Your APIs Secure?
Contact our expert team for comprehensive API security assessment