API Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing
Using OWASP API Security Top 10, we identify and assess REST API and GraphQL vulnerabilities including BOLA/IDOR, broken authentication, data exposure, and rate limiting flaws.
API Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing Services
Choose the service that fits your API type
Complete OWASP API Security Top 10 (2023) Coverage
Our tests cover all ten OWASP top API security risks
Broken Object Level Authorization
Broken Authentication
Broken Object Property Level Authorization
Unrestricted Resource Consumption
Broken Function Level Authorization
Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows
Server Side Request Forgery
Security Misconfiguration
Improper Inventory Management
Unsafe Consumption of APIs
Why API Security Matters?
APIs are the heart of modern applications and provide direct access to sensitive data
Modern applications rely heavily on APIs. Mobile apps, SPAs, microservices, and IoT devices all communicate through APIs, making them critical attack targets.
APIs provide direct access to backend data and business logic. A single vulnerability can expose millions of records or enable unauthorized actions.
Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) is the #1 API risk. Attackers can access other users' data by manipulating object IDs in API requests.
APIs often expose undocumented endpoints, debug features, or legacy versions. These hidden endpoints are frequently targeted by attackers.
API Types Coverage
Specialized testing for REST API and GraphQL
- Authentication & Authorization
- BOLA/IDOR Testing
- Rate Limiting & Throttling
- Input Validation
- Mass Assignment
- Sensitive Data Exposure
- HTTP Method Tampering
- CORS Configuration
- Introspection Security
- Query Depth Limiting
- Query Complexity Analysis
- Field-level Authorization
- Batching Attacks
- Alias-based DoS
- Query Injection
- Schema Exposure
Specialized API Methodologies
We leverage globally recognized frameworks for API security assessment
Top 10 API Security Risks (2023) - Industry Standard
For API risk identificationApplication Security Verification Standard - API Section
For security verificationWeb Security Testing Guide - API Testing Chapter
For comprehensive API testingSecurity review of OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
For API documentation reviewWhat Do We Test?
Comprehensive coverage of all API security aspects based on OWASP API Security Top 10
- JWT Security
- OAuth 2.0 Flows
- API Keys
- Token Expiration
- Refresh Token Security
- BOLA / IDOR
- Predictable identifiers
- Ownership checks
- Nested resources
- Admin endpoints
- HTTP method tampering
- Mass assignment
- Read-only field writes
- SQL / NoSQL injection
- Command injection
- XXE
- Deserialization
- Parameter pollution
- Rate limit bypass
- Oversized payloads
- Expensive queries
- Costly third-party calls
- Automation abuse
- Workflow step skipping
- Race conditions
- Business limits
- URL parameters
- Webhooks
- Import from link
- Cloud metadata endpoints
- Excessive data in responses
- Error and stack traces
- Debug endpoints
- Sensitive headers
- CORS policy
- TLS configuration
- HTTP headers
- Verb tampering
- Documentation exposure
- Deprecated versions
- Undocumented endpoints
- Non-production hosts
- Unvalidated upstream responses
What should the test start with?
The sooner the team knows what exists, the more of the time goes into testing it.
Closest to an outside attacker, and the only way to learn what is reachable without being documented. It spends time on discovery that could have gone into testing.
The usual choice. Coverage is far wider in the same time, and authorization can be tested properly because there are several callers to compare.
For logic that cannot be inferred from the outside, and for confirming whether an authorization check exists at all rather than guessing from responses.
Scope, and what we need from you
The quality of the result depends more on these few things than on anything else.
An OpenAPI or Swagger file, or a Postman collection, or a capture of real traffic. Without one of these the first days go to discovering what exists.
Object-level authorization is the first item in the OWASP API Top 10 and it cannot be tested with one account. Two peers per role, and one account per privilege level.
Testing resource limits means sending traffic that looks abusive. On production that needs agreed hours; on staging it needs data that resembles the real thing.
Where an API gateway or WAF rate-limits by address, our addresses are allowed through for part of the test, so what is measured is the API and not the gateway.
A named contact on both sides. An exposed administrative endpoint is reported the day it is found, not in the final report.
How each finding gets its severity
A number with no method behind it does not help anyone decide what to fix first.
Every finding is scored with CVSS v3.1, so there is a common language with your engineers and with the tools you already use.
The same weakness on a lookup endpoint and on one that moves money are not the same finding. The base score is adjusted for the data and the action behind it.
Each finding comes with the request and the response that show it. What cannot be reproduced is not reported as a confirmed finding.
The report proposes a sequence: what to fix before the next release, and what can wait for the version after it.
Our Process
Our structured approach to API security assessment
We map all API endpoints using documentation, traffic analysis, and fuzzing. We identify hidden endpoints, deprecated versions, and undocumented features.
Using specialized API security tools, we perform automated testing for common vulnerabilities, rate limiting, and authentication issues.
Expert manual testing for business logic flaws, BOLA/IDOR, authorization bypass, and complex attack chains that automated tools miss.
Detailed report with CVSS scores, API-specific remediation, Postman/Swagger collections, and free retesting after fixes.
Project Deliverables
Comprehensive and actionable reports for technical and management teams
Executive Summary
What was tested, what was found and what it means for the business, in language a non-technical reader can act on.
Technical Report
Each finding with its CVSS v3.1 score, the exact request and response that show it, and the endpoint and method it affects.
API Collection
A Postman collection of the requests that reproduce each finding, so your engineers can confirm a fix without waiting for us.
Free Retesting
After you fix, each finding is retested and either confirmed closed or reopened with what still works, and the report is updated.
Frequently Asked Questions
We test all types of APIs including REST APIs, GraphQL APIs, SOAP/XML web services, gRPC APIs, WebSocket APIs, and webhook implementations. Our testing covers both public-facing APIs and internal/microservice APIs. We work with any API regardless of the technology stack or framework used.
BOLA (Broken Object Level Authorization), also known as IDOR, occurs when an API doesn't properly verify that the requesting user has permission to access a specific object. For example, changing /api/users/123 to /api/users/456 to access another user's data. It's #1 because it's extremely common, easy to exploit, and can lead to massive data breaches.
GraphQL has unique security concerns: introspection queries can expose the entire schema, nested queries can cause DoS through complexity attacks, batching enables brute-force attacks, and field-level authorization is often overlooked. We test for GraphQL-specific vulnerabilities including query depth attacks, alias-based DoS, and mutations without proper authorization.
Documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger, Postman collections) helps accelerate testing, but it's not required. We can discover API endpoints through traffic analysis, mobile app reverse engineering, or web application inspection. We often find undocumented endpoints that aren't in official documentation but are still accessible.
Timeline depends on API complexity and scope. A typical REST API assessment with 20-50 endpoints takes 1-2 weeks. Complex APIs with multiple authentication methods, extensive business logic, or GraphQL take 2-3 weeks. Large microservice architectures may take 4+ weeks. We provide detailed scoping during initial consultation.
We use industry-leading tools including Burp Suite with API-specific extensions, Postman for API interaction, OWASP ZAP for automated scanning, custom Python/Go scripts for fuzzing, GraphQL-specific tools like InQL and GraphQL Voyager, and specialized tools for JWT testing and rate limit analysis.
Yes, we have extensive experience testing OAuth 2.0 flows (Authorization Code, PKCE, Client Credentials), OpenID Connect, JWT-based authentication, API key schemes, and custom authentication mechanisms. We test for token leakage, improper token validation, scope bypass, and other authentication vulnerabilities.
You receive: Executive Summary, Technical Report with CVSS scores and proof-of-concept requests, Remediation Guide with code examples, Postman/Swagger collection of all tested endpoints, API inventory with risk ratings, and compliance mapping. Plus a report walkthrough session and free retesting after fixes.
Yes, we test both external-facing and internal APIs. Internal APIs often lack proper authentication assuming they're "internal only", but attackers who breach the perimeter can exploit these. We can work with VPN access, test environments, or API gateways to assess your internal API security.
Cost depends on: number of endpoints, API complexity (REST vs GraphQL vs gRPC), authentication mechanisms, need for business logic testing, and compliance requirements. A basic REST API assessment starts at one price point, while comprehensive testing of complex microservice architectures costs more. Contact us for a free consultation and accurate quote.
Not strictly, but it changes what the time buys. With a specification, a Postman collection or a capture of real traffic, the work starts on testing. Without one, the first part of the engagement goes to discovering what exists, and anything undocumented that we fail to find stays untested.
Because broken object-level authorization is the first item in the OWASP API Top 10 and it cannot be demonstrated with one account. The test is whether user A can read or change user B data, and that needs a real B to point at.
A gateway limits how fast something can be called; it does not decide whether the caller should have been allowed at all. Authorization, business logic and the data in a response sit behind it and are untouched by it. Part of the test therefore runs with our addresses allowed through, so what is measured is the API rather than the gateway in front of it.
Yes, with the hours and the limits agreed beforehand. Two parts need care: testing resource limits means sending traffic that looks abusive, and any operation that writes needs an agreement about what may be created and how it is cleaned up afterwards.