Mobile + API Combined Assessment
Comprehensive assessment covering both mobile app and backend API
Our Combined Mobile and API Assessment tests a mobile app and the backend API it talks to as one system, end to end. The app is tested with the OWASP MASVS and MASTG; the backend is tested with the OWASP API Security Top 10. Most real damage happens at the seam between them — a token the app trusts too much, an object ID the server does not check ownership of, a function the app hides but the API still exposes. We test each side and then the flows that cross the boundary: how the app authenticates, what it sends, and whether the API enforces the same rules the app appears to. Every finding is carried through to a working proof, rated with CVSS alongside its real impact, and written up with a concrete fix.
What's Included
Mobile app testing per the OWASP MASVS and MASTG: storage, crypto, platform, network, and resilience
Backend API testing per the OWASP API Security Top 10
Broken object level authorization (BOLA): can one user reach another user's objects by changing an ID?
Broken authentication and weak or forgeable tokens
Broken function and object property level authorization — actions or fields the app hides but the API still allows
Unrestricted resource consumption and missing rate limiting
Authentication and token flow between app and API, including refresh and logout
Certificate validation and pinning, and traffic that can be intercepted or replayed
Secrets and API keys embedded in the app
Security misconfiguration and improper inventory of API endpoints and versions
How It Works
- Executive summary with a combined risk overview for decision-makers
- Detailed technical report, each finding with a reproducible proof of concept
- App-side findings mapped to the OWASP MASVS
- API-side findings mapped to the OWASP API Security Top 10
- Integration findings at the boundary — token flow, transport, and server-side enforcement
- CVSS severity and business impact for every finding
- Prioritized remediation roadmap across app and API
- Re-testing after remediation
Why HafezSecure
Frequently Asked Questions
It tests a mobile app and its backend API as one system. The app is tested with the OWASP MASVS and MASTG, the API with the OWASP API Security Top 10, and then the flows that cross the boundary between them — authentication, tokens, and server-side enforcement — with every finding proven and rated.
The most damaging issues live at the boundary. The app's interface hides actions and fields, so a test that only drives the app misses them — but the API still exposes them. Testing both together lets us send the app's own requests directly and check whether the server enforces the rules the app appears to.
Broken object level authorization is when the API returns or changes an object based on an ID in the request without checking that the caller owns it. Change the ID and you reach someone else's data. It is the top API risk, so we test it directly with a second account against the first.
We can work black-box from the outside, grey-box with test accounts and API documentation, or white-box with source access. Grey-box is the usual choice; white-box gives the deepest coverage. Either way we ask for at least two accounts per role so we can test one user against another.
We prefer a staging environment with representative data, because API testing sends many requests and probes authorization boundaries. Where a test must touch production, we agree the limits in advance and avoid any destructive or high-volume action.
We test the API the app actually uses, whether it is REST, GraphQL, or another style. The authorization and authentication risks in the API Security Top 10 apply across styles; the way we exercise them adapts to the interface.
Each finding gets a CVSS score for a common baseline, adjusted by the real impact in your system — what an attacker reaches, how easily, and what data or accounts are at risk. That is why two issues with the same CVSS can be prioritized differently.
Yes — after you remediate, we re-test the reported findings on both the app and the API to confirm each fix holds. Duration depends on the size of the app and the number of API endpoints, and we give a firm estimate after scoping.
We scope the endpoints and services in the assessment up front. Testing more services adds effort, so we agree the boundary before we begin and reflect it in the estimate — nothing is tested outside the agreed scope.
Related Services
Complementary services that might be useful for you